By the Constitution, we gave
ourselves the right to vote.
And to do so every four
years, by Jove!
Thus came another bout; we
did the needful.
But not everyone was happy, even
by the Constitution.
Those unhappy had a choice
to ventilate their position.
To the Supreme Court they
went, to air their grievance;
Hoping that in the end, they
will gain more than a pittance.
Anxiously the whole nation
waited, with corked ears and shined
Eyes to capture every moment.
January 2021 came and the
show began in deed.
The losing party as
petitioner started with his evidence;
Three witnesses he called,
only two appeared
In person; the third came
via video link, with a judicial officer
In his house; was that
necessary in the era of digitalization?
Well, the chap is lucky; he
drinks tea with the Queen.
With or without biscuits,
only he can tell. After the three witnesses spoke,
No figures were given; thus
the hope of a run-off was growing dim.
The petitioner was not
despaired; he wagered the returning officer
Will come to the rescue. But
the respondents and their lawyers had other plans.
Mounting the witness box was
the last thing on their minds.
The choice to be mum was
received with mixed feelings, depending
On the political hat the
person expressing it was wearing.
‘You can’t compel a party to
give evidence’, those with elephantine heartbeats
Screamed their lungs out;
‘You can’t refuse to give evidence when you
file a witness statement’, the inanimate
umbrella adherents countered.
What did the 7-member referee have to say? You can lead a horse to water,
but you can't make it drink. Chief referee fixed a date for written
addresses.
Petitioner’s lawyer was not done yet; let the
fun begin, he whispered to himself.
With light, camera and action, the stage was
set; applications and reviews ad nauseam.
Here at last! It had been eight years in
coming.
Elections chair thus had the
blessing of the referees to stay quiet,
And same was received with
all pleasure.
So now we know; returning
officers declare results,
And their task is done. Losers
can go to hell or go to court.
If they go to hell, our peace of mind we have;
if they go to court,
Returning officer becomes tongue-tied and keeps
mum.
Should returning officers refuse to speak to
elections they declare?
Should Auditors-General refuse to speak to
surcharges they make in their reports?
Will anyone be ever accountable for their
constitutional duties?
Constitutional office holders need not decline
To speak to their constitutional duties in a
constitutional democracy.
That was the intendment of the framers of the
Constitution.
Eight years prior, precedent was set; the
returning officer spoke and the sky
Did not fall. This new precedent we now set,
how does it stand us in good
Stead? Every four years to come, our right to
vote we will exercise.
This we shall do, till thy kingdom come.
Will there be petitions in future? No one can
tell for now.
Will the returning officer speak? No one will
ever know.
But optimistic we must be, lest
we create furrows in our brows.